Consulting Services

Our engineers offer a wide range of consulting services to support the planning, analysis, and design of water management modeling.

Model Planning
  • Development of methodologies and approaches to meet project objectives
  • Development of quality control policies, procedures and checklists
  • Data compilation, parameterization, delineation and discretization of hydrologic/hydraulic models
  • Conversion and consolidation of existing water management models or transfer of model parameters into SWMM5 and PCSWMM, including legacy SWMM4 models, spreadsheets, asset management databases, GIS shapefiles, CAD drawing files, etc.
Model Analysis
  • Model debugging and warning/error resolution
  • Output interpretation
  • Measured flow and rainfall data screening and verification ― including statistical and time series analyses
  • Model calibration and validation ― including sensitivity and error analysis
  • Servicing design optimization and regulatory permitting support
Model Design
  • Water quality modeling ― including generation, transport, and treatment of sediment/pollutants and hydraulic resident time analyses
  • Green infrastructure and LID design ― including rainwater harvesting/reuse strategies, flow duration/frequency or hydromodification analyses for permitting compliance, and other applications (e.g., CSO volume abatement, stormwater user fee credit eligibility, etc.)
  • Downstream watercourse and waterbody impact assessment ― including system performance evaluation of environmental flows, erosion stream thresholds, and other parameters identified by aquatic biologists and geomorphologists
  • Flood risk/vulnerability assessment, flooding/erosion hazard identification, and floodplain mapping
  • Representation of 2D approximation of surface flooding based on available digital topographic information to improve the simulation of overland flow routes for dynamic major/minor drainage system modeling, flood inundation studies, and integrated 1D-2D floodplain modeling
  • Wastewater system evaluation ― including capacity analysis, real-time control and storage/capacity optimization, support for infiltration/inflow studies, CSO/SSO mitigation planning, and long-term control planning
  • Adaption and extension of existing models:
    • -   To reflect post-construction conditions (operational/system change, new development, new field survey and topographic data, etc.)
    • -   To integrate other water management systems (stormwater, wastewater, groundwater, potable water, and reclaimed water)
Featured Consulting Projects

Take a look at some of the projects we've recently consulted on. These highlight how our consulting engineers work in tandem with clients to achieve their project objectives.

Don Mills Channel Flood Reduction in the City of Markham
Date:
September 2016
Location:
Markham, Ontario, Canada
For more information:
Visit the Don Mills Channel Flood Reduction page
Discussion

Originally designed to convey a 5-year storm event, a recent analysis estimated the capacity of the Don Mills Channel to be less than a 2-year storm. This insight led the City of Markham to retain The Municipal Infrastructure Group (TMIG) and Computational Hydraulics Int. (CHI) to build an integrated PCSWMM 1D-2D dual drainage model of the approximate 7.3 km² channel study area.

Discharging into the German Mills Creek, the Don Mills Channel is 3 km long and the study area is comprised mostly of commercial and light industrial development, with some residential areas. The completed model consists of approximately 120 subcatchments and 500 conduits representing almost 38 km of drainage network – including storm sewer pipes, major system flow paths, culverts, ditches and the channel itself.

Calibration of the model was based on observed high water marks from two historical flooding events: August 18th, 2005 and July 27th, 2014. An integrated 2D model component was added to better represent floodplain storage and conveyance throughout the study area.

Moving forward, the objectives remain to: estimate existing capacities of minor and major drainage system infrastructure under different design storms and recent major storm events; evaluate overland flow paths; estimate hydraulic grade lines in storm sewers; identify problematic areas due to capacity of the current drainage systems; and evaluate new developments and intensification on the capacity of major and minor drainage systems.

Agricultural BMP Decision Support for Rural Ontario Watersheds
Date:
2015
Location:
Ontario, Canada
For More Information:
Discussion

Agricultural production continues to expand and intensify around the world. In rural watersheds with complex stormwater conveyance systems, models designed to predict the downstream impact on water quality and quality due to changes in on-farm management practices tend to inadequately represent the spatial and temporal resolution required in the simulation of hydraulic systems.

In search of an innovative and cost-effective solution for increasing water quality, conserving water and lowering energy use, Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority (ABCA) retained Emmons and Olivier Resources Inc. to assist in launching a new Rural Stormwater Management Model (RSWMM) as part of the Healthy Lake Huron project.

PCSWMM and SWMM were chosen to help simulate the downstream impacts of a suite of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in order to improve water quality and quantity in the Bayfield North watershed. PCSWMM was used to manually verify subcatchment delineation, perform calibrations through its Sensitivity-based Radio Tuning Calibration (SRTC) tool and simulate sand, silt and clay using its Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) routine.

Additionally, four pollutants were calculated using PCSWMM’s Derive Functions tool: Total Nitrogen (TN), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Particulate Phosphorus (PP) and Total Phosphorus (TP). Setting up BMPs using a field shapefile was facilitated by the software’s ability to (a) define enforced value lists for attributes; (b) group attributes into customizable categories; and (c) auto-express attributes.

This exciting new resource is enabling landowners to make increasingly informative decisions about erosion and runoff control projects; and rural extension staff are now better equipped to design soil and water conservation projects which protect and improve water quality in Lake Huron.

Flood Management in Wood Buffalo: Training and Support Services
Date:
December 2015
Location:
Wood Buffalo, Alberta, Canada
Discussion

Downtown Fort McMurray is highly susceptible to flooding – especially under extreme ice jam conditions. To avoid riverbank erosion, washed out roads and threats to private property and public infrastructure, the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo utilized PCSWMM’s integrated 1D-2D modeling tools to simulate urban and riverine flooding compounded by ice jams in the Athabasca River.

A combination of ice-related and open water flood conditions were represented in the 2D hydraulic model. One extreme condition was an approximate 100-year ice-jam stage event concurrently with 100-year return period streamflow in the upstream rivers and watercourses.

In addition to the 2D model, PCSWMM’s Watershed Delineation and Transect Creator tools were used to set up a 1D model of an upstream watershed. Training on the development and application of integrated 1D-2D modeling was also delivered to help staff better visualize and depict flood inundation results that would be suitable for presentation to senior staff and elected officials.

As a result of this project, recommended enhancements to the model were identified and a series of videos were prepared to highlight flood inundation extents and velocity vectors throughout the 26.4 km² (10.2 mi²) study area.

Cooksville Creek Dual Drainage Model
Date:
June 2014
Location:
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
For more information:
Read the ICWMM abstract
Discussion

Located entirely within the City of Mississauga, the Cooksville Creek watershed has been under increasing urban development pressure since the 1940’s and has experienced flooding during recent large storms.

In response, working closely with the Credit Valley Conservation Authority and the City of Mississauga, CHI developed a detailed hydrologic/hydraulic dual drainage (i.e. minor/major system) model for the watershed using PCSWMM.

The objective was to determine overland flow routes (major system), hydraulic grade lines and the capacity of existing storm sewers (minor system), as well as to assist with master planning and historical event analysis.

PCSWMM was utilized because of its ability to efficiently process and calibrate the highly detailed 33 km² dual-drainage watershed model, which included more than 4,000 subcatchments, 8,000 conduits and 500 km of drainage network.

Model calibration success was measured using Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient for maximum and total event flows, indicating a very good calibration at the flow gauge location. The model continues to be instrumental in helping the City of Mississauga understand the effect of drainage infrastructure improvements on reducing the extent and frequency of flooding.

Real-Time Flood Forecasting for the Don River Watershed
Date:
April 2010
Location:
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
For more information:
Discussion

Flooding in urban areas can cause significant property damage and human injury. Historical extreme precipitation events in the Toronto area have highlighted the need for enhanced warning systems to inform decision making prior to a storm’s arrival.

In response, Computational Hydraulics International (CHI) and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority developed a high resolution, deterministic, physically-based, remote-sensing, real-time flood forecasting and web-based decision support system. This system has since been applied to the Don River watershed, which is home to 1.2 million people and covers 360 km² of drainage area – 80% of which is highly urbanized.

The project goal was to enable flood duty officers to make more informed decisions by providing them with predicted peak flows of a storm event at least two hours, and as much as 24 hours in advance. Integrating PCSWMM Real-Time, NEXRAD radar data, US EPA SWMM5, HTML5 and Google Maps, the system forecasts near-future water surface elevations and relays the information to a web-based platform for analysis and decision making.

Key features of the flood forecasting system include: real-time radar-rainfall acquisition, processing and forecasting, real-time flow and rain gauging, continuous hydrologic modelling, flood vulnerable asset analysis and predictive weather modelling.

RADAR acquisition and processing capabilities in PCSWMM allowed use of high spatial and temporal resolution rainfall and the ability to track storm speed and direction, as well as the ability to “ground-truth” or calibrate rainfall estimates using a network of ground-based rain gages in the watershed. CHI used the HEC-RAS model import tools of PCSWMM to generate the hydraulic components for the model.

The Don Valley flood forecasting model computed eight of the ten highest peak flows within a 10% margin of error and the remaining two within 20%. Performance of the PCSWMM model for historical events provided sufficient confidence to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority officials to use the methodology in real-time flood forecasting and warning.

Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit Action Plan (SNAP)
Date:
March 2010
Location:
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
For more information:
Visit the SNAP page
Discussion

As part of an effort to prepare Brampton, Ontario's County Court neighborhood of 5,800 people for climate change and help the community become more environmentally friendly, greener streetscapes were sought.

Referred to as the Sustainable Neighbourhood Retrofit Action Plan (SNAP), this project involved using PCSWMM to evaluate a variety of Low Impact Development (LID) scenarios to determine which ones lead to the greatest improvement in stormwater quality and quantity. Flow monitoring data collected from two storm sewer locations was used for model calibration, and water quantity was continuously tracked.

PCSWMM was utilized to create the SWMM5 model as it has a number of built-in tools that assisted in project management, assembly, calibration and inference; including its physically-based LID/GI modeling approach, topological tools for fast parameterization, and the Sensitivity-based Radio Tuning Calibration (SRTC) tool that reduced the time required for calibration.

Since the completion of this project, the City of Brampton has since successfully installed its first bio-filter swale and identified a multi-objective solution, addressing irrigation and untreated stormwater.

Past Consulting Projects
2020 - Present
2022 | 
AECOM
 
Hamilton, ON
2022 | 
Martinez Couch & Associates, LLC
 
Rocky Hill, CT
2022 | 
AECOM
 
Ajax, ON
2022 | 
City of Kirkland
 
Kirkland, WA
2022 | 
New Brunswick Dept. of Transportation
 
Fredericton, NB
2022 | 
Sustainable Water Infrastructure Group, LLC
 
Seattle, WA
2022 | 
W.K. Dickson & Co., Inc.
 
Raleigh, NC
2022 | 
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
 
St. Louis, MO
2022 | 
K.E. McCartney & Associates, Inc
 
Mansfield, OH
2022 | 
InterCAD Services Ltd.
 
Vancouver, BC
2021 | 
RQAW Corporation
 
Fishers, IN
2021 | 
Gradient PLLC
 
Cary, NC
2021 | 
Threadcraft Engineering, Inc.
 
Albany, GA
2021 | 
Town of Fort Frances
 
Fort Frances, ON
2021 | 
Resilient Consulting Corporation
 
Whitby, ON
2021 | 
HDR Inc.
 
St. Louis Park, MN
2021 | 
AECOM
 
Barrie, ON
2020 | 
Visco Engineering Inc.
 
Lakeshore, ON
2020 | 
AECOM
 
Greater Sudbury, ON
2020 | 
Credit Valley Conservation
 
Mississauga, ON
2020 | 
Trojan Technologies Inc.
 
London, ON
2010 - 2019
2019 | 
Resilient Consulting Corporation
 
Whitby, ON
2019 | 
City of Mississauga
 
Mississauga, ON
2019 | 
Emmons & Olivier Resources
 
Toronto, ON
2019 | 
N.J. Peralta Engineering Ltd.
 
Kingsville, ON
2019 | 
SE Design and Consulting Inc.
 
Cold Lake, AB
2019 | 
Credit Valley Conservation
 
Mississauga, ON
2018 | 
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
 
Franklin, TN
2018 | 
AECOM
 
Kitchener, ON
2018 | 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
 
Toronto, ON
2018 | 
City of Calgary
 
Calgary, AB
2018 | 
AECOM
 
Kitchener, ON
2018 | 
Palmer Environmental Consulting Group
 
Toronto, ON
2018 | 
Aird & Berlis
 
Toronto, ON
2018 | 
Emmons & Olivier Resources
 
Toronto, ON
2017 | 
AECOM
 
Kitchener, ON
2017 | 
Eden Mills Millpond Conservation Association
 
Guelph Eramosa, ON
2017 | 
Palmer Environmental Consulting Group
 
Toronto, ON
2017 | 
Kerr Wood Leidal
 
Burnaby, BC
2017 | 
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
 
Franklin, TN
2017 | 
City of Barrie
 
Barrie, ON
2017 | 
Emmons & Olivier Resources
 
Oakdale, MN
2016 | 
Credit Valley Conservation Authority
 
Mississauga, ON
2016 | 
Ecosystem Services
 
Charlottesville, VA
2016 | 
Aquafor Beech Ltd.
 
Guelph, ON
2015 | 
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
 
Fort McMurray, AB
2015 | 
AECOM
 
Kitchener, ON
2015 | 
Credit Valley Conservation Authority
 
Mississauga, ON
2015 | 
Credit Valley Conservation Authority
 
Mississauga, ON
2015 | 
City of Barrie
 
Barrie, ON
2015 | 
Onno Fortuin Consulting
 
South Africa
2015 | 
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
 
Newmarket, ON
2014 | 
City of Ottawa
 
Ottawa, ON
2014 | 
Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority
 
Exeter, ON
2014 | 
Halifax Water
 
Halifax, NS
2014 | 
City of Montreal
 
Montreal, QC
2013 | 
Credit Valley Conservation Authority
 
Mississauga, ON
2013 | 
City of Pickering
 
Pickering, ON
2013 | 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
 
Toronto, ON
2013 | 
AMEC Earth and Environmental
 
Burlington, ON
2013 | 
Kasraie Consulting
 
Ventura, CA
2013 | 
Credit Valley Conservation Authority
 
Mississauga, ON
2012 | 
Exp.
 
Barrie, ON
2011 | 
AMEC Earth and Environmental
 
Burlington, ON
2011 | 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
 
Toronto, ON
2011 | 
Exp.
 
Barrie, ON
2011 | 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
 
Toronto, ON
2011 | 
FarWest Restoration Engineering
 
Alameda, CA
2010 | 
Credit Valley Conservation Authority
 
Mississauga, ON
2010 | 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
 
Toronto, ON
2000 - 2009
2009 | 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
 
Toronto, ON
2008 | 
BETA Group
 
Lincoln, RI
2008 | 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
 
Toronto, ON
2008 | 
Brown & Caldwell
 
Columbus, OH
2008 | 
Wedler Engineering
 
Chilliwack, BC
2008 | 
Goba Engineering
 
La Mercy, South Africa
2007 | 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
 
Toronto, ON
2007 | 
AMEC Americas
 
Halifax, NS
2007 | 
Erie County Dept. of Environmental Protection
 
Buffalo, NY
2007 | 
FarWest Restoration Engineering
 
Alameda, CA
2006 | 
Imbrium Systems Inc.
 
Toronto, ON
2005 | 
City of Longview
 
Longview, OR
2004 | 
F.von Langsdorf Licensing Ltd.
 
Caledon, ON
2004 | 
MidWestern Consulting
 
Ann Arbor, MI
2004 | 
Comeau Experts - Conseils
 
Salaberry-de-Valleyfield, QC
2002 | 
Keiser Associates
 
Kalamazoo, MI
2002 | 
BIOS
 
Les Saintes, Guadaloupe, FWI
2001 | 
Natural Resources Canada
 
Ottawa, ON
2001 | 
J & B Engineering
 
Toronto, ON
2001 | 
Phillip G. Bozzo, P.C.
 
Troy, MI
2001 | 
Health Canada
 
Ottawa, ON
2001 | 
Cosburn, Patterson, Mather
 
Markham, ON
2001 | 
Keiser Associates
 
Kalamazoo, MI
2000 | 
Walter P. Moore & Assocs., Inc. with Rice University
 
Houston, TX
2000 | 
Municipalities of Cape Province
 
South Africa
2000 | 
University of Cape Town
 
South Africa
1990 - 1999
1999 | 
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
 
Sault Ste. Marie, ON
1999 | 
Golder Associates
 
Mississauga, ON
1999 | 
F. von Langsdorff Licensing
 
Idyllwood, ON
1999 | 
URS/Greiner Woodward Clyde
 
Gaithersberg, MD
1999 | 
URS/USGS
 
Northborough, MA
1999 | 
Tetra-Tech
 
Fairfax, VA
1999 | 
XP-Solutions
 
Portland, OR
1999 | 
Tom Hancock
 
Elmvale, ON
1998 | 
DHI
 
Trevose, PA
1998 | 
Phillip G. Bozzo, P.C.
 
St. Clair Shores, MI
1997 | 
US EPA
 
Edison, NJ
1997 | 
Cyril J. Demeyere
 
Ottawa, ON
1997 | 
McNamee, Porter & Seeley, Inc.,
 
Detroit, MI
1996 | 
USEPA Great Lakes
 
Buffalo, NY
1996 | 
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
 
Livonia, MI
1995 | 
Le groupe Seguin
 
Montreal, QC
1995 | 
Acres International Ltd
 
Niagara Falls, ON
1995 | 
City of Edmonton
 
Edmonton, AB
1995 | 
US EPA Office of Science and Technology
 
Edison, NJ
1995 | 
CH2M Hill
 
Portland, OR
1995 | 
E.M.H.T.
 
Columbus, OH
1995 | 
Butler Krebes Associates
 
Edmonton, AB
1995 | 
UNI-GROUP USA
 
Austin, TX
1994 | 
McNamee, Porter & Seeley, Inc.
 
Detroit, MI
1994 | 
E.M.H.T.
 
Columbus, OH
1994 | 
Chapman Ltd.
 
Northborough, MA
1994 | 
KST Hydroelectric Engineers
 
Toronto, ON
1993 | 
Royal Society of Canada
 
Ottawa, ON
1993 | 
USEPA Great Lakes
 
Buffalo, NY
1993 | 
Dutton, Brock, MacIntyre & Collier
 
Toronto, ON
TALK TO US
WE'RE HAPPY TO CONNECT WITH YOU:
OR WE MEET WITH YOU:
  • Via web conferencing
  • In-person at our office
  • In-person in the comfort of your own office
Request consulting services
CONTACT INFORMATION

TELL US ABOUT YOUR PROJECT NEEDS